Subject	Dyno'ed again today, this time on a Dynapack set up
Posted by	Turbodog (CT) on September 13, 2003 at 9:50 PM
	This message has been viewed 226 times.
Message	My last dyno was on a Dynojet and the torque numbers were ridiculous at 605~618lb-ft, I've been having a hard time believing those torque numbers. Interestingly the HP numbers were pretty much right on the mark compared to the Dynapack results. So on the Dynapack the numbers were a more realistic 478whp and 438lb-tq at 17 psi. The timing is at 16 deg and it was in the 70's with high humidity today. Just like the sport600 car Ash dyno'd today, my car had issues getting over 18 psi without serious fluctuations in boost. So I kept it at a more manageable 17psi till I can get under there and tighten up the wastegate springs a bit more. Last dyno: 478 whp 435 lbs-tq On 94 octane @ 17psi Best 1/4 mi: 12.55 & 117mph (w/clutch slipping)
Follow Ups	Dyno'ed again today, this time on a Dynapack set up - Turbodog (CT) 21:50:33 09/13/03 your dynojet tq #'s were 160+ftlbs more than the dynapack? - Janders 21:58:43 09/13/03 Yep, 4 or 5 runs in a row, all over 600lb-ft. Strange. (n/m) - Turbodog (CT) 22:10:45 09/13/03 they probably fubared the gear ratio info (n/m) - Janders 22:52:41 09/13/03 It has nothing to do with gear ratio. It has to - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 22:57:23 09/13/03 I'm retarded - Janders 23:20:01 09/13/03 Did the other guy fix his car? - TTwinZ (CT) 23:17:36 09/13/03 We fixed the oil leak, but something broke inside also - Turbodog (CT) 05:49:40 09/14/03 Yea definatly not good. (n/m) - TTwinZ (CT) 08:33:29 09/14/03 Damn I wish I could have made it down!! I had something come - RED ZYA IN CT 09:43:26 09/14/03 It was Rich's car. We think his car was shipped here - Turbodog (CT) 10:51:46 09/14/03 Did the graphs look similar? - Chip(GinnMotorSports) 20:33:31 09/14/03 Haven't compared em yet, I left the other chart @ work :( (n/m) - Turbodog (CT) 21:36:55 09/14/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.